If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. how to block radiation from wifi router 's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
https://fnote.me/notes/a1SzxP is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.